I tested a cheap camera and ended up learning about false advertising…
Patreon:
Host and Creator – Simon Cade
Gear used in this video:
Prograce Kids Camera:
Panasonic S1H:
85mm f/1.8 lens:
Feelworld LUT5 Monitor:
PATREON:
WEBSITE:
TWITTER:
INSTAGRAM:
CONTACT: simon@dslrguide.tv
Music from Audiio Pro:
(Use the promo code “Simon70” at checkout for 70% off your first year)
source
The camera is awesome !
Why you too much complaint ??
Can you dismantle it and remove the built in lens and expose the sensor and modify it to accept the c/cs mout lenses to see if this "toy" could be any usable…and seeing its limits…. will get better quality images/video than. The current potato pics/vids ..
This would have been so cool if I was a kid what are you talking about.
I bought a camera from aliexpress at 3 euro, because i knew it was really cheap and was what I was looking for. But they all do this thing of puting an high end camera photograph to sell their 360p low cost camera, obviously nobody can produce a " quality " image with that money (i mean in term of sharpness, dynamic, etc. because for me you can still produce good pictures with it)
dude you are taking this way too seriously its just a kids camera
OMG- this is perfect for experimental full feature films.
Is there anyway to bring back retrieve deleted photos? My granddaughter accidentally hit delete all and she is very sad and is there anyway to bring back her photos?
For 18 quid that camera isn't even that bad. The camera my brother got from an airport duty free store had way worse quality and the frame rate fell off a cliff if the shot was above 240p and was slightly dim
This camera doesn't even warrant such scrutiny.
I want to see a music video shot with this little toy camera.
So these were the cameras-lenses they would put in Nintendo's 3DS, now everything makes sense.
They probably edited the photos after but used that camera and made the photos look better than the quality because of the editing on a much more hire quality gadget
The 1080p footage looks like 480p footage blown up to 1080p.
I would love to meet your fictional daughter. Along with your fictional wife.
4:24 "Am I judging this cheap camera too harshly? Has this company actually done anything wrong?"
The images captured by this cheap camera doesn't seem so bad to me.
However, using images from other camera to boost sales is wrong.
It's time to set limits on such kind of marketing tricks.
The aesthetic is crazy, what you on about?
Pink cheap camera = ready for making a dogma95 film
Looks like you bought an NES emulator with an extra camera feature. Seems like a steal to me.
Blimey, at that price point literally any camera out of a charity shop would beat that hands down
damn i like the vhs vibe. just need more chromatic aberation
I feel like countless companies do this. Thus, help me understand the point here. Were you trying to expose a company for doing what a lot of others do already? Or were you trying to provide some value? Regardless, I will file this whole video under the simple lesson, "You get what you pay for".
This video was entertaining to watch, and your fictional daughter story in the email gave me a good laugh!
But the sound effects are the best thing about the camera!!!
agree with you, if i were a kid, id feel hurt and angry at the results
But, as for right now, if there was a way to change the lens, why not use this for some weird music video or short film, maybe a wide filter too, maybe anamorphic filter also (Sirui 1.5x)
April is 6 months away man. 😅
Should be heavy heavy regulation on what can be sold and the way companies go about advertising their products need heavy regulation too. Shouldn’t really be a debate but unfortunately McDonald’s sells cancer and it’s legal.
But the dude speaks through Nice tutorials teeth
jajajajjs che vato cagapalo
I loved this idea! I think you could push it further and try shooting something on this camera, perhaps a short film or even just a series of photos? Prove that although they may have lied or stretched the truth about their product, it's still somewhat usable for children? This would've been great for me to use as a child, even if the quality isn't great: gives you a chance to focus on other things like composition.
My father bought the "adult" version of a similar camera. Yes, he was an unwitting sucker who believed what they said. Sue them… they need to be off the market- it's false advertising. Should Amazon also be sued?